Assiment p-6 victorian age

Topic: Write an essay on the ‘Novelists’ of the Victorian age
Name: Nasim.R Gaha
Roll no: 22(Twenty two)
Year: 2018-2020
Enrolment No: 2069108420190014
M.A :    Sem-2(Two)
Email-ID : gahanasin786@gmail.com
Paper No : 6(The victorian literature)
Submitted to: SMT.S.B Gardi Department of English maharaja krishnakumarsihji Bhavnagar university.





        Introduction

         Every nation has their own history, as some England has their own history. We found there are so many period like ‘ The Elizabethan age’ ‘The age of Milton’ ‘The Romantic age’ The victorian age’ and at last ‘The modern age’ etc. Here I would like to introduce The age of Queen Victoria in detail.  The victorian age started in 1832 to 1887 during the reign of Queen Victoria.
         The victorian age is one of the most remarkable periods in the history of England. Victorian writer put weight only on prose and novel. We can see that many writer write novels and other but we rarely found a person write drama or play.
         
            The  Novelist
Charles Dickens
William Makepeace  Thackeray
George Eliot   
Minor novelists of  The victorian
              Charles Reade
               Anthony Trollope
               Charlotte Bronte
               Bulwer Lytton
               Kingsley
               Mrs. Gaskell
               Richard doddidge Blackmore
               Thomas Hardy
                Robert Louis Stevenson


Charles dickens
 He was born in 7 February 1812 and died 9 June 1870          was an English writer and social critic. He created some of the world's best-known fictional characters and is regarded by many as the greatest novelist of the Victorian era.[1] His works enjoyed unprecedented popularity during his lifetime, and by the 20th century critics and scholars had recognised him as a literary genius. His novels and short stories are still widely read today.[2][3]
Charles Dickens merupakan seorang penulis sekaligus novelis kelahiran Portsmouth, Inggris. Nama Dickens begitu populer di era Victoria Abad ke-19. Ia termasuk orang yang sangat berpengaruh kala itu.

Lewat karyanya, selain berbagi cerita kisah kehidupannya, ia juga menyalurkan aspirasinya sebagai kritikus sosial.

Meski ia tidak mendapatkan pendidikan formal yang cukup, Dickens decanal genius oleh beberapa kritikus dan ilmuwan di Abad ke-20By 1815, the Dickens family moved to London and later on to Chatham. At Chatham, Charles received education at William Gilles School. Special attention was given to Charles by William Giles, the schoolmaster. In 1824, Charles father John was imprisoned in the debtor’s prison in Southwark, London.      At this time, Charles was twelve years old who, along with his sister Fanny were permitted to spend a day in Marshalsea where their father had been imprisoned. Charles lived in a boarding but due to the family’s condition, he began working at Warrens Blacking Warehouse, Hungerford Market, London.
He would work there for around ten hours every day and his earning was six-shilling a week. The working conditions had made a deep impact on Charles who later on used this9 experience to essay his characters. However, when Charles father was in the debtor’s prison, Johns grandmother died leaving some money for him, some of which was used to pay his debt. Charles Dickens’ Schooling
From 1824-1827 Charles studied at Wellington House Academy, London and his mother did not remove him from the blacking factory immediately. It is said that her failure to remove him from the factory attributed to his demanding and dissatisfied approach towards women. was at Mr. Dawsons school in 1827 and from 1827 to 1828 he worked at a law office as a clerk. After working in the law office he was a shorthand reporter at Doctors Commons. In 1833 he began his career as a fiction writer and A Dinner at Poplar Walk was his first published sketch in the Monthly Magazine.
His experience at the law office and being a reporter was used by Charles to write his works like Nicholas Nickleby, Dombey and Son and in particular Bleak House. Charles Dickens’ Wife
In 1830, Charles met Maria Beadnell and fell in love with her. However, her parents were against this relationship and so they sent Maria to a school in Paris. In 1836, his first novel The Pickwick Papers was serialized. In 1836 he became the editor of Bentleys Miscellany and remained at that post for three years.
In the same year on 2nd April Charles married Catherine Thomson Hogarth and together they had ten children. Charles was fond of Cathrine’s sister Mary who lived with the Dickens family. He essayed her death in The Old Curiosity Shop as the death of Nell.
Charles and his wife visited America in 1842. There, Charles gave lectures in support of copyright laws. In November 1851, Charles moved into Tavistock House and it was here that he wrote Bleak House, Hard Times and Little Dorrit. Charles’ second visit to America was in 1867.
After separating from his wife, Charles in 1858 undertook his first series of public readings in London. Charles major works like A Tale of Two Cities and Great Expectations were published in 1859 and 1861 respectively. Around the same time, he was the publisher and editor of journals such as Household Words and All the Year Round.
Charles was involved in giving farewell readings in England, Scotland and Ireland between 1868-1869. on 22nd April while giving one of his readings, Charles suddenly fell down at Preston, Lancashire. His fall was an indication of a mild stroke and after this incidence, all his remaining readings were cancelled.
It was then that he started working on his last novel, The Mystery of Edwin Drood. Charles however, arranged for the partial, if not complete, reading of the series once his health improved. Charles last public appearance was at the Royal Academy Banquet. Charles Dickens’ Death
On 8th June 1870, Charles suffered another stroke. He died the next day, on 9th June at Gads Hill Place.
Charles had expressed that he should be buried at Rochester Cathedral in an inexpensive, unostentatious, and strictly private manner but, was instead buried at Poets Corner of Westminster Abbey.
William Makepeace Thackeray
Today is the bicentenary of Henry Mayhew (25 November 1812 – 25 July 1887).
“I think you will agree to be one of the most beautiful records of the nobility of the poor; of those whom our jaunty legislators know nothing. I am very proud to say that these papers of Labour and the Poor were projected by Henry Mayhew, who married my girl. For comprehensiveness of purpose and minuteness of detail they have never been approached. He will cut his name deep.”
This was written in 1850 by Douglas Jerrold, Mayhew’s friend, collaborator and father-in-law at a time when Henry Mayhew would have been collating the first edition of London Labour and the London Poor (1851). Jerrold was mainly wrong, because today Mayhew is all but forgotten. This is a great pity, because the writer was hugely influential in his own time, not least among his near-exact contemporaries, Charles Dickens (b 1812) and William Makepeace Thackeray (b1811). Mayhew, a journalist (he and Dickens both worked as reporters for the radical Morning Chronicle), novelist, playwright and comic writer, was responsible for telling historians a great deal – probably most – of what we know about the lives of the poor and destitute in London in the mid-19th Century. He not only provided heart-rending (albeit far from relentlessly unamusing) pen-portraits of the poorest men, women and children eking out an existence in the streets: he provided his own estimates and data as to their numbers, earnings etc. – the curtain-raiser if you will to Charles Booth’s work a generation later.
That’s his value to the historian. But Mayhew’s greatest achievement, one might argue, was to co-found Punch magazine in 1841, with Mark Lemon and Stirling Coyne. Although he only remained actively involved with the publication for a handful of years, it thrived and survived right down to our own times.

Works

Catherine
A shabby Genteel story
Mrs. Perkins’s
The Book of snobs
Vanity fair
Pendennis
Vanity fair
The Rose and the ring
The virginians

George Eliot

Although female authors were published under their own names during her lifetime, she wanted to escape the stereotype of women's writing being limited to light hearted romances. She also wanted to have her fiction judged separately from her already extensive and widely known work as an editor and critic. Another factor in her use of a pen name may have been a desire to shield her private life from public scrutiny, thus avoiding the scandal that would have arisen because of her relationship with the married Mary Ann Evans was born in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, England. She was the third child of Robert Evans (1773–1849) and Christiana Evans (née Pearson, 1788–1836), the daughter of a local mill-owner. Mary Ann's name was sometimes shortened to Marian.[4]Her full siblings were Christiana, known as Chrissey (1814–59), Isaac (1816–1890), and twin brothers who died a few days after birth in March 1821. She also had a half-brother, Robert (1802–64), and half-sister, Fanny (1805–82), from her father's previous Women writers were common at the time, but Evans's role as the female editor of a literary magazine was quite unusual. During this period, she formed a number of unreciprocated emotional attachments, including one with Chapman (who was married, but lived with both his wife and his mistress), and another with

      Works
      Adam bade
       The mill on the floss
       Silas manner
        Romany

Assaiment p-5 Romantic litrature

Topic: write about the salient features of the romantic age
Name: Nasim.R Gaha
Roll no: 22
Email ID: gahanasim786@gmail.com
Enrollment: 2069108420190014
Submitted to: smt.S.B Gardi department of English maharaja krishanakumar sihji bhavnagar university








Romantic age

Romantic period has started with the publication of Lyrical Ballads by William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, both were the prominent poets of the age and they have proved that it was

“The second creative period of English literature”
 
    Majority of writers were not ready to accept their identity as a romantic writer but after the lectures of August Schlegel about romanticism he has depicted classicism as ‘plastic’ and materialistic and romantic age as ‘organic’, and because of this point of view Romanticism has started in its flaw.

      The important movement has been started from Berlin, in Berlin there were a lot of space for writers and all artists. They encouraged writers, painters and singers to establish their works.

       In this age there were several movements were going on, it was a time when two books about England have been published,
search
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Romanticism was a literary and intellectual movement that lasted from the late eighteenth century through the mid-nineteenth century. Classic examples of Romantic novels are Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Though academics consider Romanticism difficult to define—the movement developed differently in European countries than it did in the US—there are a few key features we can talk about.
The first is important: Romanticism was reactionary. The movement was, at least in part, a response to the Industrial Revolution and the Age of Enlightenment. Rather than focusing on science, logic, or reason, as was the zeitgeist on both sides of the Atlantic, Romantic writers were nostalgic, looking to a simpler past for inspiration. Much as we, as contemporary readers, may look back to the pre-internet era with some sentimentality (remember when we looked things up in an actual encyclopedia instead of Googling everything?), Romantic writers fondly remembered a pre-industrial era.
Which brings us to our second point. Romantic writers expressed emotion and imagination, engaging with aesthetics and the beauty of the natural world. In the poetry and novels of the era, emotion was more important than reason or science. It stands to reason that Romantic writers also rejected some of the structure or rules that had previously governed both novel
Romanticism is a movement in art and literature in the eighteenth and nineteenth century in revolt against the neo-classicism of the previous centuries. It is the direct outcome of French Revolution. The French Revolution directly inspired by Rousseauism, had its influence on the Romantic Poets, both in its revolutionary ideals and in its excess of terror. This imaginative literature of the early nineteenth century found its creative impulse in the sociological ideal.

Romanticism is a contrary to the neo-classicism. Neo-classicism can be characterized by emotional resistant, order and logic while romanticism gives emphasis over imagination. The romantics write what they get from their imagination. The romantics tried to see life with new sensibilities and fresh visions. They are deeply aware of their social obligations, but the burden of an exception vision of life drives them into being almost fugitives from their fellow-men. The romantic poets lead the readers to the strange areas of human experience, but seldom welcome him in the language of ordinary conversations, or even with currency of normality.

Romanticism started its journey in English Literature wit the publication of Lyrical Ballads, a joint work of Wordsworth and Coleridge in 1798. Its communion with nature, interest in simple human life, profound impulsiveness, imaginative propensity and lyrical subjectivity etc. are its salient features.

Romantic age is essentially an age of verse. The spirit of romanticism is found primarily struck in poetry in the liberation of poetic inspiration and impulses. This dominant of poetry is found echoed in words worth’s famous saying, “Poetry is the breath and finer spirit of all knowledge.

Romantic poets had a strong power of imagination. All the poets of this period possess this imaginative power which made their works different from their predecessors. We see the use of this imagination in “Kubla Khan” and “The Ancient Mariner” of Coleridge.

The imaginative power of the romantic poets leads them to mysticism. The poets of romantic age found interested in the mysticism. The poets of romantic age found interested in the mysterious unknown world that lives on the other side of life. Wordsworth viewed nature from a mystic angle, Coleridge’s mysticism found in his fascinating treatment of the supernatural world in his poems, Keats, Shelly and other poets also deal with mysticism.

Love for beauty and nature is another feature of romanticism. All the romantic poets had a deep interest in nature not as a center of beautiful science but as an informing and spiritual influence on life. The common elements of nature i.e. the rising sun, the blooming flower and deep blue sky are like living soul-mighty and gigantic to the romantic poets. The romantic poets also found everything lovely and beautiful in nature and man. “Beauty is truth and truth beauty” is the poetic philosophy of the age of romanticism.

The romantic poets are found to deal with human life in its essential traits, in liberty, simplicity and purity, childhood and primitive simplicity are idealized by Wordsworth whereas Byron and Shelly remain the assertive poets of humanity. Other poets and prose writers also deal with humanity.

Hellenism is finely incorporated and echoed in the poetry of romantic age, mainly in the poems of Shelley and Keats. The romantic poets looked upon Greek Literature. They did not borrow the elements but the content of Greek Literature and shaped it with their own genius as like as Shelley did in “Prometheus Unbound”

The romantic poets gave emphasis upon content rather than form and structure. The content of a literary work is the measure by which the romantics measured a literary work. The romantic poets deny the notion that poetry has its own exceptional word stock. They used simple diction rather than elevated diction. They used the word of rustic and daily life in their poetry. Wordsworth, in the later editions of Lyrical Ballads said that the Language of poetry ought to be the same as the language of a simple farm-worker.

Every literary period is sharply inspired by the social and political condition of its own time. But romanticism is free from this kind of inspiration. It criticizes the growth of industry and town though it took birth in the golden period of industrious revolution. The romantic poets turning to nature for protection also criticize the traditional religious belief of the time.

The romantic literature was marked, and is always marked, by a strange reaction and protest against the bondage of rule and custom in science and theology, as well as literature, generally tent to fetter the free human spirit. Romantic poets are essentially subjective self-revelation a creed with them. In their poetry may be found much of their mind and spirit. They seem to take their readers into confidence and pour into their ears all their passions and pains, all their dreams and desires. It’s a cardinal element in all romantic poets. As in the prelude’s words worth made an epic of personal experience based on his own life.

In general, these are the features of romanticism. Of course, romantic poetry is no sudden phenomenon in the literature of England. It is rather an inevitable reaction of the artificial and critical poetry of the eighteenth century with all the features There are as many definitions of poetry as there are poets. Wordsworth defined poetry as “the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings;” Emily Dickinson said, “If I read a book and it makes my body so cold no fire ever can warm me, I know that is poetry;” and Dylan Thomas defined poetry this way: “Poetry is what makes me laugh or cry or yawn,
There are as many definitions of poetry as there are poets. Wordsworth defined poetry as “the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings;” Emily Dickinson said, “If I read a book and it makes my body so cold no fire ever can warm me, I know that is poetry;” and Dylan Thomas defined poetry this way: “Poetry is what makes me laugh or cry or yawn, what makes my toenails twinkle, what makes me want to do this or that or nothing.”

Homer’s epic,The Odyssey, described the wanderings of the adventurer, Odysseus, and has been called the greatest story ever told. During the English Renaissance, dramatic poets like John Milton, Christopher Marlowe, and of course Shakespeare gave us enough to fill textbooks, lecture halls, and universities. Poems from the romantic period include Goethe’s Faust (1808), Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan” and John Keats’ “Ode on a Grecian Urn.”
Shall I go on? Because in order to do so, I would have to continue through 19th century Japanese poetry, early Americans that include Emily Dickinson and T.S. Eliot, postmodernism, experimentalists, slam…
So what is poetry?
Perhaps the characteristic most central to the definition of poetry is its unwillingness to be defined, labeled, or nailed down. But let’s not let that stop us, shall we? It’s about time someone wrestled poetry to the ground and slapped a sign on its back reading, “I’m poetry. Kick me here.”
Poetry is the chiseled marble of language; it’s a paint-spattered canvas – but the poet uses words instead of paint, and the canvas is you. Poetic definitions of poetry kind of spiral in on themselves, however, like a dog eating itself from the tail up. Let’s get nitty. Let’s, in fact, get gritty. I believe we can render an accessible definition of poetry by simply looking at its form and its purpose:
One of the most definable characteristics of the poetic form is economy of language. Poets are miserly and unrelentingly critical in the way they dole out words to a page. Carefully selecting words for conciseness and clarity is standard, even for writers of prose, but poets go well beyond this, considering a word’s emotive qualities, its musical value, its spacing, and yes, even its spacial relationship to the page. The poet, through innovation in both word choice and form, seemingly rends significance from thin air.
How am I doing so far? On to purpose:
One may use prose to narrate, describe, argue, or define. There are equally numerous reasons for writing poetry. But poetry, unlike prose, often has an underlying and over-arching purpose that goes beyond the literal. Poetry is evocative. It typically evokes in the reader an intense emotion: joy, sorrow, anger, catharsis, love… Alternatively, poetry has the ability to surprise the reader with an Ah Ha! Experience — revelation, insight, further understanding of elemental truth and beauty. Like Keats said:
“Beauty is truth. Truth, beauty. That is all ye know on Earth and all ye need to know.”
How’s that? Do we have a definition yet?
Poetry is artistically rendering words in such a way as to evoke intense emotion or an Ah Ha! experience from the reader.
Pretty unsatisfying, huh? Kind of leaves you feeling cheap, dirty, all hollow and empty inside like Chinese food.
Don’t do this. Don’t shackle poetry with your definitions. Poetry is not a frail and cerebral old woman, you know. Poetry is stronger than you think. Poetry is imagination and will break those chains faster than you can say “Harlem Renaissance.”
To borrow a phrase, poetry is a riddle wrapped in an enigma swathed in a cardigan sweater… or something like that. It doesn’t like your definitions and will shirk them at every turn. If you really want to know what poetry is, read it. Read it carefully. Pay attention. Read it out loud. Now read it again.
There’s your definition of poetry. Because defining poetry is like grasping at the wind – once you catch it, it’s no longer wind.

Matthew Arnold

Matthew Arnold ,was born in 24 December 1822 and died in 15 April 1888 and was an English poet, who worked as an inspector of schools. He was the son of Thomas Arnold, the famed headmaster of Rugby School, and brother to both Tom Arnold, literary professor, and William Delafield Arnold, novelist and colonial administrator. Matthew Arnold has been characterized as a sage writer, a type of writer who chastises and instructs the reader on contemporary social issues.

Q-1 write about one idea of Matthew Arnold which you find interesting and relevant in your time?

Matthew Arnold talk about good poetry in his essay. Idea of Matthew Arnold which I found interesting that, he says "poetry is cruticicr of life" it's interesting according to me. It is true that poetry is criticism of life and this definition is a very relevant in our time. so, according to me that is interesting idea of Matthew Arnold.


Q-2 write about one idea of Mathew Arnold which you find out of date and irrelevant in your time?

Matthew Arnold's Touchstone method is out of date and irrelevant in our present time. Because touchstone method is comparative method of study. This method is comparison ans analysis as two primary tools for judging individual poet.. It means we can not give our interpretation and judgement to other works, because we can not compare their work with other work for example If we compare two things. many other things. we can not judge both mobile with Touchstone method, because every one have a specialty as well as literature we can not give our interpretation and judgement to compare with other work, because we can not compare every one have their own interpretation and views towards their work. so the idea of Touchstone method is irrelevant in our time.

T,S Eliot :Tradition and Individual talent

T.S Eliot

• He was born 1888 and died 1965
• He was a great critic, poet,playwright and journalist.
• Eliot come with new ideas in criticism`s world in 19th century.
• Eliot`s criticism became revolutionary at that time.
• he was very practical man.
• 20th century got 'metaphysical' revival because of Eliot.
• Because he was the first person who recognized or a accepted the uniqueness of metaphysical of 17th century.
• Eliot planned  numerous critical concepts that a broad influence on criticism.
• Objective co-relative, Dissociation, of sensibility, unification of sensibility, theory of Denationalization etc.

  

• TRADITION INDIVIDUAL TALENT ESSAY: 
  The essay was first published in The Egoist.                       
   The Egoist was a literary magazine.which is considered today as England's most modernist periodical.This essay was later publish in The sacred wood Which is Eliot`s first book of criticism.              .
 

1) conception of tradition: He says about Englishmen`s attitude towards french literature. Englishmen have a habit to feel proud on themselves. That is the proud for their creativity and more less practicality. In french there is a mass of critical writing. Eliot compares English with french that they have habit of critical method and English have a habit of conclusion. 

           We only conclude that the french are more critical than we and sometimes even plume ourselves a little with the fact as if the french were less spontaneous.

        Eliot say criticism is as inevitable as breathing
        He  admire those aspects which are different from the poets predecessors

     They want uniqueness.The always find isolation of the poet from his immediate processor.
     
such resemblance is mostly seen in the period of maturity of  the poet, not in the period of adolescence.
so,by this he asserts that tradition and individuality go together.
The historical sense is inevitable for any poet. Then Eliot talks about tradition and historical sense He says that if the from of tradition remained only in blind adherence of dead people or ancestors, then it would be lost or such tradition should be destroyed.According to Eliot in every traditions also there is a bit of novelty.Tradition is a matter of much wider significance. It can not be inherited,and if you want it you must obtain it by great lab our.It involves in the first place, the historical sense.  The historical sense forces a man to write not only by the own generation, but with the whole age of English litterateur.It harmonizes two different things timeless and temporarily in poet`s work.No poet no artist of any art has his complete meaning alone. His significance,his appreciation is the appreciation of his relation of  the dead poets and artists. you can not value him alone,you must set him,for contrast and comparison among the dead.Conformity between the old the new. The whole order of existing moment is readjusted with addition of new work.so,by this unchangeable.The past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past.A poet can not use past as a sapless mass.The dead writers are remote from ua because we   know so much more thane they did.He talks about necessary of knowledge for poets. He rejects that belief that a poet requires a huge amount of learning. He believes that much learning deadens or perverts poetic sensibility. He is not in favour of confining the knowledge for examination, library or publicity.The progress of an artist is a continual self sacrifice,a continual extinction of personality.

2)Theory  of  impersonal of poetry :Honest criticism and sensitive appreciation is directed not upon the poet but upon the poetry.Eliot compares criticism with science. There are two gases needed : oxygen and sulfur dioxide. and also they must have the presence of filament platinum.He compares this palpation with the poet.In this whole process the filament of platinum plays vital and inevitable role.But yet that role is indirect. In that process platinum remains inert and unchanged.It should give its total contribution in creating poetry, also it should remain unaffected and separate when  poetry has come out.According to him The poet`s mind is like a utensil in which numerous feeling,phrases and images can be stored or seized. When a poet wants them he unites them. It does not mean that the poem created by the poet shows his personality or nature.This balance of constructed demotion is in the dramatic situation to which the speech is pertinent,but that situation alone is inadequate it.Every time poet`s own emotion can not be taken place in the poem. A poet has to use ordinary emotions.Poetry is a great deal.When a poet becomes personal while writing poetry,he will be considered as a bad poet.Because, he becomes unconscious, where he should be concision.When a poet escapes from his personality,then the great poem comes.He says; poetry is not a turning loose of emotion,but an escape from emotion,it is not the expression of personality.

 3)Conclusion:    It is very hard thing to take interest in poetry to keep a poet aside.we usually read poem with the name and fame of the poet. We can not separate from each other.A poem must know that to reach the level of impersonation,he first has to scarifies himself and has to surrender himself totally to that work.

Marrio

Marrio

  Marrio Vargas Lisa, the Peruvian novelist, was awarded the noel prize for literature in zoo. His most recent novel is "The neighbourhood " He was interviewed for the world post by Michael skafidas, a journalist and professor of comparative literature at the city university of new yorkN

    Here I am sharing the ideas which I like the most from his interview 

1)     young people today tend to think that images can form modern creative citizens they don't images create a passive citizens more easily domesticated than the citizen formed by ideas. I am certainly abvinced that idea are much more important than image. 

2)  In Human being there are angles and Devils are also important stupidity. 

3)   If you respect literature you must accept not only idealist, altruistic vision of humanbeing but also the infernal vision of them.

Aishwaryam. Youth. Festival 2018, MKBU

Aishwaryam. Youth festival  2018.MKBU

                  Mharaja krishnakumarsinhji   Bhavnagar  university  has celebrated the AIshwaryam youth festival of. There day 26th, 27th and 28th october. This. Festival is not only for  watching. This festival let young generation show their talents through various competitions. 

               In  This youth festival every college show own ability and atr by their talent and give some of idea to do something different this events like singing,  writing,  dancing, drawing and acting play also . I was look some of events these.  I like it and thus.  I try to explain it in my words.
         

                                       RANGOlI



                                     In our every  function rangoli is very  famous and  useful  art in the world.  There make  rangoli in tradition style with different colors. Some of use only color and flower and water color rope and many other thing use in this competition and try to became some thing good and show their own way ability  They draw different some of describe all religion, some of draw like  FB,

                                               

1)  shree kalaguru dharmshi shah theater first day performance is in this theater. Group song is perform there





2)       POETRY   RECITATION


                 In this competition that when we comes that time they give subject and say to write suddenly in this 20- 25 student have take part in this competition, and this subject like, The story of pen, feeling of jungle girls,  song of rain and story of jungle girl describe this poem feeling mara ghare aavo Mara ram story of SHABARI  in the Ramayana most of them

                   

Prada's lost

• Prada's lost

• Introduction

      Paradise Lost , Epic poem in blank verse, one of the late works by John Milton, originally issued in 10 books in 1667 and, with books 7 and 10 each split into two parts , published in 12 books in the second edition of 1674.


Many scholars consider Paradise Lost to be one of the greatest poems in the English language . It tells the biblical story of the fall from grace of Adam and Eve in language that is a supreme achievement of rhythm and sound . The 12 books structure , the technique of beginning in medias res, the invocation of the muse, and the use of the Epic question are all classically inspired. The subject matter , however , is distinctly Christian .


Summary :



With Raphael’s departure for Heaven, the story no longer consists of conversations between heavenly beings and humankind. Milton explains that he must now turn to Adam and Eve’s actual act of disobedience. The poem must now turn tragic, and Milton asserts his intention to show that the fall of humankind is more heroic than the tales of Virgil and Homer. He invokes Urania, the “Celestial Patroness” (IX.21) and muse of Christian inspiration, and asks for her to visit him in his sleep and inspire his words, because he fears he is too old and lacks the creative powers to accomplish the task himself. He hopes not to get caught up in the description of unimportant items, as Virgil and Homer did, and to remain focused on his ultimate and divine task.







Satan returns to the Garden of Eden the night after Raphael’s departure. Satan’s return comes eight days after he was caught and banished by Gabriel. He sneaks in over the wall, avoiding Gabriel and the other guards. After studying all the animals of the Garden, Satan considers what disguise he should assume, and chooses to become a snake. Before he can continue, however, he again hesitates—not because of doubt this time, but because of his grief at not being able to enjoy this wondrous new world. He struggles to control his thoughts. He now believes that the Earth is more beautiful than Heaven ever was, and becomes jealous of Adam and Eve and their chosen status to occupy and maintain Paradise. He gripes that the excess beauty of Earth causes him to feel more torment and anguish. Gathering his thoughts into action, he finds a sleeping serpent and enters its body.


The next morning, Adam and Eve prepare for their usual morning labors. Realizing that they have much work to do, Eve suggests that they work separately, so that they might get more work done. Adam is not keen on this idea. He fears that they will be more susceptible to Satan’s temptation if they are alone. Eve, however, is eager to have her strength tested. After much resistance, Adam concedes, as Eve promises Adam that she will return to their bower soon. They go off to do their gardening independently.




1) Write a critical note on character of Eve.




Eve is the most important character in Paradise Lost, she is the one who first eats the Forbidden Fruit and then convinces Adam to eat it. because she afraid to god and Satan revenge is to temp eve is success in there plan after this all things Adam things that,




"Should God create another Eve, and I




Another rib afford, yet loss of thee




here is we see that Adam is driven by human emotion because Adam love eve His intentions is not tempted or forced upon him. He, after deep thinking, decides to be on the side of Eve rather than God.

in this thinking we now know that eve's character strong then god. Adam is accept the things also Satan driven by eve's beauty so this points clear that eve character is main in the poem.


2) Whose arguments did you find more convincing?




Ans :- I think eve's arguments are more convincing. because, we can see logic in her argument.

when she argues with Adam about work and she wanted to go to another place.she argues that when they are together they waste time in watching each other and in singing songs of love so if they do work separate they won't waste time. when Satan came as a serpent it told her to eat the fruit but she argued about God's punishment.









. . . her rash hand in evil hour


Forth reaching to the fruit,


She pluck'd, she eat;


Earth felt the wound, and


Nature from her seat


Sighing through all her works


Gave signs of woe,


That all was lost.



Q:- How do you look at Divine Perspective in the Genesis of The Holy Bible and Human Perspective in John Milton's Paradise Lost Book IX?









divine perspective: in Genesis the fall is narrated from god's perspective obviously god is the center of bible eve, Adam, and Satan, fall happens god punished all three, the entire story of genesis is obviously, god centric.

human perspective: in Milton's Paradise lost book 9 we find the same story told from Human perspective.




we find eat the fruit was to gain knowledge to know good and evil. to giving intention is in favor of human rather than God.





secondly we find that Adam has also reason of doing that. he disobey God out of his love towards the Eve.